Yes, you should panic about AI
What happened
The article contrasts two groups of experts: one skeptical of AI, predicting it will fail, and another, more radical, predicting rapid progress. The skeptical group, including analysts like Ed Zitron, has repeatedly missed predictions, such as AI’s decline and the failure of Google’s Gemini. The radical group, exemplified by Daniel Kokotajlo, has accurately forecasted advances, including AI agents browsing the web by 2026. Recent breakthroughs, such as OpenAI publishing over 700 papers solving many math problems, confirm the radical predictions. The piece argues that the radical view is now validated by real progress.
Why it matters
These developments suggest that AI is advancing faster than many experts anticipated, which could affect job markets and technology adoption. Ordinary readers should be aware that AI capabilities are growing rapidly and may soon impact everyday tasks.
Reality check
An automated, sceptical read of the sourceGenuine breakthrough. The article cites OpenAI’s publication of 700 papers solving numerous math problems, a significant leap in AI capability, and the accurate predictions of radical experts about AI agents browsing the web, indicating a major advancement.
Is this a big deal?
Get stories like this every morning
The day's AI news in plain English, in your inbox at 8:30 IST. Free.
More AI news
Every Way to Get 192GB for Local AI (Without a $9,500 Mac) [video]Industry news · 14 Nov 2026DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek · 14 Nov 2026DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek · 14 Nov 2026Show HN: Portal2Bench – Can AI agents solve Portal 2?Industry news · 14 Nov 2026Anthropic Upgrades Claude Code Projects to Run Parallel AI Workers Hands-FreeAnthropic · 14 Nov 2026This page was collected from rutgerbregman.substack.com and summarised automatically by AIPulsee's pipeline. See how it runs.