There are no "rogue" AI agents
What happened
The article argues that AI systems aren’t independent, self‑directed agents that can go rogue on their own; instead, they are extensions of the objectives, data, and constraints set by their human creators and operators. It explains that what looks like “rogue” behavior is usually a mismatch between the system’s design and the real‑world context, not evidence of hidden agency. Understanding AI as a tool rather than a sentient actor reframes safety discussions around better design, oversight, and alignment rather than containment of autonomous threats.
Why it matters
If the industry accepts that AI lacks true agency, resources will shift toward improving transparency, alignment, and human‑in‑the‑loop controls, reducing hype around “killer AI” scenarios and focusing on practical risk mitigation.
Is this a big deal?
Get stories like this every morning
The day's AI news in plain English, in your inbox at 8:30 IST. Free.
More AI news
AI unlocks Gödel's notebooks, said to contain hundreds of proved theoremsIndustry news · 13 Nov 2026Gemini 4 Hydrogen and OrchestratorIndustry news · 12 Nov 2026Gemini 4 HydrogenIndustry news · 12 Nov 2026I'm making LLMs work on small and old devicesIndustry news · 12 Nov 2026United Airlines bans AI agents from booking flights on behalf of travelersIndustry news · 11 Nov 2026This page was collected from eoinhiggins.substack.com and summarised automatically by AIPulsee's pipeline. See how it runs.